Monday, September 18, 2006

Impact (1949)

Posted by Dave G

Brian Donlevy is happily married San Francisco automobile mogul Walter Williams, and Helen Walker his apparently devoted wife Irene. They live happily ever after. Oh, if only things were that simple …

There’s one slight problem: dear Irene is sick of her hubby. She schemes with her secret lover to have him bumped off during a long car journey, but the plan goes awry. Walter takes a tyre-iron to the head and tumbles into a ditch, but secret lover fella is panicked by a passing truck and gets himself killed in a car wreck while fleeing the scene. Walter, evidently possessed of a steel-plated skull, wakes up later with a headache and a little case of amnesia.

Stumbling upon a small Idaho town, Walter’s luck soon changes. He bumps into garage owner Marsha Peters (Ella Raines) who, impressed by Mr Amnesiac’s skills as an auto mechanic, offers him a job. Back in San Francisco, meanwhile, Charles Coburn’s crusty old detective Quincy is investigating that flaming wreck on the highway – and assumes that the body is that of Walter Williams.

With Walter and Marsha beginning to fall for each other, newspaper reports of his “death” jog Walter’s memory, as Det. Quincy’s continuing investigations lead him to suspect Irene of her husband’s murder. Will Walter extract revenge by letting her be convicted? Or will Marsha persuade him to do the right thing and return to San Francisco? For any first time viewers reading, I’ll leave you to find out – Impact has a few more twists left before the end …

video

OK, Impact is nobody’s idea of a classic, but it’s a highly enjoyable sort of diet-noir, with more than enough points of interest to warrant a look. The plot is an irresistibly outrageous series of coincidences, a melting pot of almost every noir staple you could want: a femme fatale, attempted murder, amnesia victim, police investigations, false accusations, reluctant witnesses. Then there’s the cast: Brian Donlevy is no Bogart, but he does a solid job in the lead; Helen Walker is in her element as the callous, duplicitous wife; a mischievous Charles Coburn is reliable support as the police detective; and of course there’s Ella Raines as the world’s cutest grease monkey - they sure don’t look like her at my local Kwik-Fit.

The film isn’t 100% noir: it doesn’t possess enough of the look, with too much of the action set away from the big city, in broad daylight. The ending is also atypically upbeat (not that I mind a happy ending once in a while). That said, the film has some nice location work in the City by the Bay, and boasts a few great noir sequences, notably the atmospheric murder attempt on Walter Williams while changing a flat tyre on a dark, deserted highway.

Impact is out there on a decent quality DVD from Image. I wouldn’t try and claim it as a knockout noir, but for an engaging diversion you could do far worse.




7 comments:

  1. This is a great film that I think is under rated because of its Public Domain status. Great job.
    ReplyDelete
  2. "I wouldn’t try and claim it as a knockout noir" - Neither would I. I thought it was a total yawner. - Wes Clark

    p.s. Isn't it odd how Brian Donlevy managed to work his way into so many different kinds of films? What a career! I read somewhere that while he didn't have much range, he played the "tough but fair" type better than anyone in Hollywood. I think his best role was in "The Big Combo," which had a vulnerable side (his deafness). - Wes Clark
    ReplyDelete
  3. I've seen this film several times, but not recently, so I may be wrong about this, but I believe there's an error in the article. It says, "Back in San Francisco, meanwhile, Charles Coburn’s crusty old detective Quincy is investigating that flaming wreck on the highway – and assumes that the body is that of Walter Williams." The body is that of Williams' wife's lover. If I'm right, it would be more correct and clearer to say, "and becomes suspicious that the body is not that of Walter Williams."
    ReplyDelete
  4. I just watched this film again for the third or fourth time last night. It is very enjoyable and entertaining, a nice little crime picture from the noir era. Not necessary a classic, agreed, but certainly worth checking out. There are some great San Fran street scenes, and the main characters are all quite good. The centre section of the film, with Donlevy in a small Idaho town is an interesting contrast of the idealized U.S.A. town with the darker, more sophisticated urban jungle where all the trouble starts. Walker makes a good femme fatale, and Coburn is good fun. I saw the Alpha Video version, and the DVD is pretty good. No extras, but the quality of the transfer is pretty decent. Thanks for the writeup!
    ReplyDelete
  5. There appears to be a Region 2 UK release planned, anyone know if the quality will be any good?

    So what's better, this or DOA (both from the same producers)?
    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't think this film deserves to be even mentioned in the same sentence as D.O.A.

    This one has a nice idea and a good basic setting, but there's too many light and (supposedly) humorous scenes for my liking.
    ReplyDelete
  7. Regarding what Janne wrote about there being too many light scenes to prohibit it from being compared to D.O.A., how about all those ridiculous wolf calls at the beginning of the latter? (And I love D.O.A.) In addition, I think the review is off a bit in saying that the newspaper articles jog Williams's memory: He recalls from the moment he regains consciousness what happened, but uses amnesia as an alibi when he finally contacts the police. Anyway, a really good film.

    -Lee B.
    ReplyDelete